Is America doomed?

Something very sinister and dangerous is transpiring in our nation.  I don’t mean to sound like an alarmist, but it’s true.  All we have to do is tally up the changes initiated since Biden took office, in addition to noting the strategic positioning of individuals selected to carry out the master plan of the man behind the curtain, and we can see it clear as day. 

Notice the speed with which it is all taking place. It reads like an accelerated plan to completely re-engineer America, and they are doing it not just in executive orders and the calculated placement of woke Leftists, but also in the effort to weed out conservatives within all government organizations, including the Pentagon and military. That is, if they can’t make them conform to their programming, which is based in a deceitful ideology of “diversity and inclusion.”  Outside of the government, educational institutions and corporations across America are falling in line, and have been since Obama first took office. HR offices now exert all authority over who they hire and who they purge for non-conformity.

This campaign to target conservatives is omnipresent, and it’s being meted out socially, too, evidenced by the labels “extremists” and “white supremacists.”  Anyone who even attempts the slightest transgression will be made an example of. Just look at the Trump supporter and former agent, who took pictures at the Capitol on Jan. 6 in order to aid the FBI, who is now facing a potential seven years in prison. This is no joke. And they started this push just after the stolen election. Hell, Trump’s Oval Office seat was still warm when they emasculated him. To wit: before the inauguration, a message went out across the military that explicitly prohibited observance any and all orders from Donald Trump.  Repeat:  They were told before Biden was sworn in that the acting president no longer had authoritative power over the military.  Then the fences went up.  And now they’re coming for our guns. That alone should prove chilling.

What is Congress doing about this?  Very little.  There are probably a handful of Republicans who try to fight back, but the rest just sit on their haunches and let it all roll out.  Why? They lack the courage, or their hands are tied for one reason or another (China money, lobby money, deals made).  Some of the Executive Orders that have been signed are, in fact, illegal, but other than a small number of organizations and individuals trying to refute them, there is no real push back. Furthermore, the Supreme Court of the United States is failing to do its job and apply justice. Just look at their paralysis when faced with the illegalities of the recent presidential election, especially when 18 states sued four states over illegal voting.  What will happen when legal arguments on the criminality of the executive orders hit their desks? Probably the same.

This is a slow totalitarian takeover, and if you don’t believe it, the tell is in the unlawfulness, rapidity, and craftiness of the power grab, not to mention their alignment with the mainstream media and big tech, which is helping to facilitate it all.  If we are lucky, we can take back Congress in 2022, perhaps even the presidency in 2024, but I’m afraid the damage will be so corrosively complete by then we won’t have a chance. I don’t have any answers, but I don’t think we can sit back and watch the squandering of our laws, our freedoms, and our beliefs performed with an unsettling haste and arrogance right before our very eyes.

Death of the Age of Reason and the rise of neo-Marxism

“Welcome to the death of the Age of Reason.  There is no right or wrong, not anymore.  There’s only being in, and then being out.”   House of Cards

The Left’s vision of an ideal society—where government controls the people, and class distinctions are obliterated (except for those at the top)—is a utopian sentiment not without its flaws. This is because in order to achieve control—control of government, control of the people, control of property, and economic control—those in power must do anything to obtain it. And they do. We’ve seen that play out for a while now, only becoming more pronounced since a light was shone on their duplicity. But the determination to gain power and to maintain it requires the very thing the Left accuse those on the Right of:  oppression. We are the oppressors, at least according to Critical Race Theory.  But they have it all backwards, like they always do, because we see who is suppressing the voices and subjugating the freedom and will of those on the Right, while they use all means antithetical to Western democracy to pursue their cause.

How did we get here?  Or, more specifically, where did we go wrong? Well, it’s not us; it’s them, and there are four areas that have propelled Leftists successfully towards their end-goal:   

Secularism.  The beginning of the end came once God—endemic to the founding of our nation—was scrubbed from our culture primarily through the legal argument that schools, government, and public spaces are no place for religion. Christians are practically pariahs now, where it’s a near-crime if, to quote Diane Feinstein, “the dogma lives loudly” in us. Christian culture is disallowed, but Islam is cherished. The country must be cleansed of Christian imagery, but headscarves are permitted, even in the hallowed halls of Congress.  So, as they erase Christianity—once the dominant religion and the reason many sought a land free from religious persecution—what are we left with? An agnostic, communist conviction, because, if there is no god, then government rules the kingdom. Why? Because those in government hold the power, and it’s clear that a very progressive strategy is unfolding.

Moral depravity.  The Left has normalized homosexuality while scoffing at Christian values. Ushered in as a sovereign right, they propped up icons like Ellen Degenerate . . . er DeGeneres, awarding her the Medal of Freedom for coming out on TV.  Now, homosexuality has morphed into the mainstream, via Hollywood, shifts in our language, and Pride parades, debasing the moral fabric of our culture as they welcome all manner of perversion.  Worse, through big money and a large social media presence, LGBTQ ideology is flourishing, and as a result, transgenderism has become a social contagion, impacting today’s youth in dangerous ways. How many children are being diagnosed with “gender dysphoria”? How many parents and psychologists are complicit in pushing hormone therapy and even sex reassignment surgery?  Those children will regret it one day, as many already are.   

This moral depravity also goes hand-in hand with a culture fixated on sex. Women’s liberation and the passing of abortion and birth control pill laws opened the flood gates to seventies licentiousness, leading to a new breed of women, as seen in Sigourney Weaver’s character Janey Carver in the film The Ice Storm. Sexually aggressive and emotionally detached, this cultural shift, wrought by feminism, is evidenced in the highlight of the film—the “key party”—on the night of the storm. The two families profiled in the film, with their blatant self-absorption and shared ennui, depict the slow demise of family in America, as new diversions emerge to satiate their boredom. The glimpse we get of these families in crisis happens to coincide with Nixon’s impeachment, and it’s there for more than cultural context. The late nineties ushered in Sex and the City, where anything goes, and it became uncool not to be hopping in bed with every Tom, Dick, and Harry around. Coinciding with that came the growth of the pornography industry, which can now happily be accessed in the solitude of home at the touch of a button, and which is likely fostering the expansive cult of pedophilia.

The Counterculture Movement. The biggest, most detrimental influence in American culture is the Counterculture Movement of the sixties. It began as an anti-establishment crusade, nudged in through the liberal intellectual influences of the Beat Generation.  Writers like Jack Kerouac, William Burroughs, and Alan Ginsberg started a literary movement in 1950s, post-war America that idealized sexual liberation, drug use, and Eastern religions as a rejection of conventional American values.  The movement increased in popularity throughout the sixties, especially in conjunction with the growing tensions over the Vietnam war.  In their effort to rebuff moral order, this subculture stopped dressing with any propriety, and embraced anything that countered normality. Communal living was popularized, and the ideals of peace, love, and harmony became the buzz words.  It culminated in the Haight-Ashbury “Summer of Love,” and then Woodstock, a hippie utopian aspiration that was actually a failure on all fronts—food shortages, traffic jams, toilet paucity, rain, mud, drugs, orgies, death, and the negative assessments of the musicians.  It soon faded, but the urge to return never goes away, as we see in today’s modern hippies.

Socialism.  The rise of socialism followed German immigrants with Marxist socialist ideals into the U.S. in the mid-nineteenth century.  By the turn of the century, the Progressive Movement emerged. It gained some steam in politics, and eked into our universities, but the Red Scare and later the McCarthy-era investigations quelled it. By the sixties, student radicalism paved the way for revolutionaries, and academia was flooded with Marxist ideologues. Community organizing over the latter decades, and a slow infiltration of socialist ideals in our government, public education, and now politics, cemented the movement in our culture. Sad to say, it’s here to stay.

Twentieth century America was the breeding ground for what has become today’s neo-Marxism, now invading much of American life.  With a destabilized culture—thanks to manufactured racism, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter, and a new, weak president installed through a stolen election and a complicit China (a Communist regime to boot)—the big-money hands working behind the scenes are on their way to their utopian ideal, that of a rising China and a New World Order in which Western Civilization is eradicated.  Clearly, they’re misguided, failing to see what America truly stands for in all its successes and achievements, and only seeing what they want, perpetuating a 1619 Project, and egging on the whitewashing of American history, as our statues fall and schools get renamed. Everything they’ve done for decades has been designed to challenge the status quo, and tear at the very fabric of our nation and our moral values. The year 2020 was their greatest experiment, where, thanks to a man-made Chinese virus, they perpetuated racial tension, poverty, sexism, and class warfare, and made us all compliant through masks and plexiglass, as businesses shuttered for good, food lines grew, and suicide became a way out. They were able to rig the election system through fake paper ballots, a Sharpie controversy, engineered Dominion machines, and mail-in voting in which illegals, dead people, and cats cast a vote. 

America as we know it is in danger, and, though President Trump fought hard, he couldn’t overcome the sinister dark workings of the collectivist machine looking to eradicate Western exceptionalism.  Who could?

America who?

And, so, the Deep State won once again.  It just shows you they can’t be beaten, but at least Donald Trump shone a light on their treachery.  In fact, his very presence drew them out, such that their shenanigans made evident exactly who they are.  Will it matter?  Will the Durham report even make a difference now?  We have to ask ourselves why that report is taking so long, after four years of the very thing the report is investigating.  Even the delay in the Pfizer announcement is suspect.  Two big events that might have saved the presidency for Trump, and yet. . . . 

So, what are we left with now?  A still-divided America, with bitterness and rancor on both sides, one thinking we’ve been craftily duped through mail-in fakery, illegal extensions, manipulated computer systems, and Sharpies, and the other, well, they’re no longer screaming at the sky after obstructing a Red Wave they knew was coming.  Still, Nancy Pelosi looks like a defeated effigy of herself after being rendered irrelevant (finally!), while Chuck Schumer exalts in his anticipation of regaining the title he’s been coveting for some time so he can “change America.”  Biden persists, though he doesn’t realize he’s not long for the Presidency because they’ll do what they can to get the radical Black female in (because if it’s done once, it can be done again), and Obama will again run the country, this time from behind the curtain.  The crafty witch of Chappaqua will be back, and she may just get more people killed so she’ll need to Bleach-bit more hard drives, but all will be well with the psyche of the nation.

But will it?  Joe Biden, for whatever time he has in the White House, will reverse by Executive Order all of Donald Trump’s successes, leveling this nation economically and politically, bringing it in closer submission to China.  Biden, a man who is no leader, who has played old-school politics for 47 years, has no desire to bring America to greatness.  He simply wants to play nice so that the Great Reset pushed by the global elites of the New World Order can ensue.  Internally, Obama’s agenda will press on, shoving diversity and bias training across all platforms (school, government, corporations), so that the White Man can be rendered immaterial, and reparations will ensue, bankrupting our nation, just so that Leftist Whites can purge themselves of their guilt.  It’s all so cozy.

One thing is very clear: presidents running for a second term generally don’t lose.  Furthermore, Trump, in this election, outperformed his 2016 victory with all races and genders, the exception being White men (which likely comprise the male coastal elites).  It is very unlikely that so many Congressional Reps were elected, a number of Senators reelected, and the energy and enthusiasm pointing towards the President, and yet Trump still lost.  Remember the rallies, the flags, the parades of trucks and cars and boats? Remember the American flags sprouting up everywhere? Notice how Trump supporters suddenly started speaking out? The enthusiasm was for Trump, we know it and they know it. But something else happened.  America has not chosen Joe Biden, Joe Biden was shoved in place by a corrupt network of shifty Leftists, many of whom didn’t even want him to run, including Barak Obama.  If Trump had been successful in smoking out all the Big Government rats, this might have been avoided, but the numbers were too great, evidenced by those he put in power himself (Esper, Wray, and Haspel, for example) . . . all never-Trumpers.  They might have won the battle, aided by America’s Big Tech companies blocking messages and shutting down accounts, with assistance from China and yet another infectious disease originating from that nation, and the additional unrest pushed by Marxists and anarchists, but the war isn’t over.

There is something those on the Left will want to remember, as they dance in the streets and eagerly await the policies that edge evermore towards the reframing of a new America, there are now more Red seats in the House, and if the Right succeed in the Georgia runoff race, they will still control the Senate. Oh, and 2022 is not far behind, such that voters on the Right, in their rising irrelevance, won’t forget.  There is still a chance for a Trump victory in 2024, and if it’s not him, there’s always Don Jr.  George Soros should not rest comfortably.

What does George Floyd’s death really exemplify?


There is a war of sorts raging in this country right now.  I’m not talking about the pandemic, which is another war unto itself.  Nor am I talking about a race war or class war; rather, I’m referring to a War of Ideology. 

The protests following George Floyd’s death have little to do with police brutality, even though that’s how they started. Floyd was already edging towards death on an overdose of Fentanyl and Meth. Floyd was also a criminal. So this, especially, shouldn’t be the end-all-be-all of police brutality cases.

Problem is, this doesn’t fit the narrative. BLM was just itching for an excuse, and the Left needed a starting point, so Floyd’s death became just that. Add in Ben Crump, the shyster lawyer for the Floyd family who rambled off a long list of dead blacks he was immortalizing for the sake of the narrative (as he was no doubt looking to pad his storehouse of bling in which he was dripping during his street briefing cum sham kneel-down-and-pray exhibition with Floyd’s son at the scene of the crime), and, well, the rest is history.

But all this posturing isn’t endemic to the War of Ideology.  That war is based in the riots, those which first blossomed out of the protests but only began when the sun went down and the mob emerged.  It kind of reminded me of the Darkseekers in I am Legend, with their overarching ferocity and single-mindedness (death and destruction).  The riots were fueled by none other than Black Lives Matter and Antifa, both violent gangs which hijacked the protests for their own gain, that being to stir civil unrest.  And why?  Well, think of the impression that nation-wide turbulence makes in an election year.  Couple that with a high COVID-19 count and an impacted economy, and you’ve hit the trifecta of election-year liabilities. This is a train the Left will ride all the way to the polls, or rather, to the mailbox with their mail-in ballots.

The Darkseekers

Black Lives Matter is an extension of the Black Panthers, but their main objective today is revolution.  They call themselves a “human rights movement,” but they aren’t.  Neither are they disenfranchised blacks looking for social justice.  They are a Marxist organization; hence the reason George Soros has financed them at the tune of $1.7 million-plus.  Sure, they harbor an overall anger at whites and black injustice, and they hate the police.  In fact, they chant:   “Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon.  Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon.  What do we want?  Dead Cops now.  What do we want?  Dead Cops now.”  You could certainly call BLM racist; they don’t like whites, except for their white “allies,” though they are incidental to their purpose even though they make an effective ruse.  For all their racism, you won’t see the Leftist media condemning them.  They are overlooked because the Left needs to cling to their double standard.

See the source image
Black Lives Matter

As to Antifa, according to The Federalist, Antifa is “mostly made up of privileged white dudes,” though I’m not sure they’re what the Washington Post characterizes as “nurses, teachers, neighbors, and relatives . . . who do not hesitate to put themselves on the line.”  If there’s one thing the riots have shown, it’s the need for this demographic (Privileged White Dudes) to cling to something in their vapid, meaningless lives, while feeding their apologetic mindset from years of ideological brainwashing in Liberal colleges as they push forth their agenda.  What is that agenda?  Well, nothing more than an extension of a Vietnam-era fight against The Man, later manifested in the militant Weather Underground, and then the more benign Occupy Wall Street.  Sure as hell seems as if Lefties have ants in their pants in every corner of the world, and they won’t ever stop. The Socialist agenda is like a cancer on any nation it infects, and it eventually metastasizes, as we’re seeing in our own nation now and around the globe.

Antifa, like their predecessors and all Socialists, want to see our systems of government dismantled, including an end to capitalism and its greedy corporations, as well as those who maintain the system, such as law enforcement.  They also want to do away with our history and our traditions as a nation. It all lines up with their Socialist ideology. And they’ll use any means to feed their malady. They are violent, though their literature encourages followers to “pursue lawful protest activity.”  Uh-huh.  For a scattered group, they have managed to work in tandem, arriving on site fully equipped, outfitted in new uniforms with truckloads of munitions in the waiting.  That costs money, and Privileged White Dudes don’t have it, not like that.  Who does?  Who funds Antifa?  Well, if you want a chuckle, just do an Internet search on “Who funds Antifa.”  You might just get this:

There is no evidence that ANYONE is “funding” Antifa. There are no membership lists or requirements. It even seems likely that many of the masked “Antifa” demonstrators are conservative provocateurs trying (and failing) to make The Left look as bad as The Right.

Right.  Thanks, Big Tech.

It’s no surprise that Antifa is also funded by George Soros, under a charity called Alliance for Global Justice, backed by Open World Society.  Read those titles once more, slowly; really let it sink in.  Soros is the Wizard behind the curtain who remains unseen, his fingers stirring every pot. He’ll do anything to push forth his ideology of a New World Order, one run by a Progressive, Socialist Left.  He’s the Supreme Leader of the War of Ideology.

George Floyd’s death, and the protests that followed, became the catalyst for white, anarchic rebellion, and an excuse, really.  To try to smokescreen it all, the Leftist media had to stir up a plot line that it was White Supremacists posing as Antifa.  As if.  Bad enough the Left blinds us with their fakery on just about anything Rightist, but this mendacity takes the cake.

Point is, the riots weren’t really about race.  After all, just like whites, black people were murdered too.  You’d think if it did involve race, not a single black person would suffer, but they have.  A group of thugs let a black retired cop die like a dog on the sidewalk after shooting him for protecting a pawn shop they were hankering to loot.  And he was one of a few.

No, this is nothing more than a fight over ideology coupled with a lawlessness borne out COVID-19 stagnancy and white debauchery.  We can only hope more sane heads prevail, and George Soros quietly goes away, though something tells me the Devil will keep him in play a while longer.

See the source image
The Wizard himself

China: The menace of the world

China is, and has been for decades, a threat to the United States, and our leadership before Trump has blissfully ignored it.
Through underhanded tactics, hacks and spies they have shown their desire to surpass and destroy the U.S. They’ve tried sneaking onto our military bases. They have been ramping up cyber-espionage efforts in the U.S. There was even a Chinese woman arrested at Mar-a-Lago! They’ve held a grip on drug manufacturing, leaving America now vulnerable. They’ve stolen trade secrets via Huawei. They have pilfered proprietary information, bribed our colleges, and fueled the opioid epidemic through Fentanyl, which is killing countless Americans. Who’s to say this virus isn’t another tactic, after having originated at one of the two biolabs in Wuhan. Is this the Christmas present Kim Jong Un was talking about? After all, he’s in cahoots with China.

The Chinese believe the world is truly their oyster, and they are out to grab it at any cost. They waste animals, such as rhinos, donkeys, and tigers, for hangover remedies, beauty treatments, and medicinal purposes; they kill sharks only for their fins; they continue to eat dogs and cats and delight in their filthy wet markets; and they consume microbe-carrying animals, such as bats, rats, snakes, and civets (responsible for the transmission of SARS). In China’s eyes, “Animals live for man.” The short of it is, China takes what China wants.

china wet market1

Tucker Carlson of Fox News has been on a rampage about the Chinese for weeks, and he’s right. In a statement in mid-March, he said, “We need to start treating China like the dangerous Cold War-level adversary it has clearly become.” This is all too true. How do we know this pandemic wasn’t by design? After all, the U.S. was doing phenomenally well economically, and the president had been frustrating much of the China’s end-goals, restructuring trade, blocking Huawei, and trying to pull back manufacturing to the U.S., to name just some of the efforts. Let us not forget China’s lies surrounding this pandemic: They didn’t inform the WHO about this for months; they have been withholding numbers and facts; they disallowed American scientists to investigate the illness in their nation; they kicked out the journalists; and many of their whistle-blowers are “disappearing.” Can’t say this doesn’t look dubious.

There is too much about China to ignore, and yet our Leftist media continue to prop up the Chinese in some attempt at virtue signaling, or worse. Instead, we ought to view the totalitarian regime as very dangerous, rather them hold them up as a paragon of value. I wonder if Google still continues to work with them while refusing our American military. I also wonder when America is going to stop Chinese “birth tourism,” where last year up to 10,000 Chinese babies were born on American soil, so-called “anchor babies,” conferring dual citizenship on them.

Nations ought to rethink the influx not just of Muslim migrants, but also of Chinese. Take, for example, Italy. A point worth noting is whether Italy got slammed from the Coronavirus because of its immense Chinese population, which would, naturally, necessitate travel to and from China. Why? Because many of them work in, and even own, portions of Italy’s textile industry. According to The Economist, they “import cheap fabrics, mainly from China, and [turn] them into fashion garments at lightning speed to keep up with fast-changing styles.” This might be why you see countless advertisements in the U.S. for sites containing what looks like high-end, quality clothing that turn out to be horrid knockoffs that you can’t return. Do an Internet search of the complaints on innumerable Chinese clothing companies, such as Nora Cora, whose advertisements are ubiquitous.

In short, the Chinese are everywhere and everywhere is becoming Chinese, due to offshore manufacturing. We ought to think long and hard about giving China so much presence. Could it be, as one poster wrote on a site I visited recently, “world domination without firing a shot”? Sounds about right. Another poster wrote: “The army of horsemen numbered two hundred million. I heard their number” Revelation 9:16. And, let us not forget Nostradamus’ prediction: “The yellow race will inherit the earth.” Something to consider in light of the current situation, and the New World Order China is grasping at.

china wet market2

The Left, in the time of Coronavirus.


When we experience times of strife, especially that which is as unprecedented and critical as the Coronavirus pandemic, it’s the moment when the wheat splits from the chaff. In this instance, the wheat is represented by those responsibly attending to the crisis, and the chaff amounts to American media and Democratic leaders.

In a time like this, we need resiliency and hope. Every day has been, and still remains, a nightmare for many of our healthcare workers.  In late March and early April, daily news broadcasts brought us frightening numbers, and they’re still frightening in some areas.  Images on TV looked like something out of an apocalyptic film. And for many of us, we can’t help but wonder if the next time we step out of the house we aren’t signing our death warrant. It’s a little like Russian Roulette.  As such, this is a time for psychological and spiritual unity. And yet, oddly, the media still refuse to relent in their ongoing attacks on the president and his administration. They squawk their ire like mindless mouthpieces bent on pursuing their Anti-Trump agenda no matter what; and they challenge him directly. CNN’s Jim Acosta is constantly pressing Trump on whether he acted soon enough, even though he banned flights from China with immediacy, for which he was called a racist; and NBC’s Peter Alexander browbeat the president over whether he was doing enough to quell fears; meanwhile, the president has been running press briefings daily to do just that—provide information and offer hope. But, as is usual with the Left, in a panic over the rise in the president’s popularity, some were calling for their networks to stop covering his press briefings, comparing them to Trump rallies. A rally? Really? Then I suppose that’s exactly the tactic of Governor Andrew Cuomo, who is presumed, now, to be a potential candidate for the presidency.

Worse, the Democrats are using this time to meet their own greedy demands.  In an effort at partisan gamesmanship, Nancy Pelosi padded Phase 3 of the legislation initiated to help American citizens and small businesses with funding for the Green New Deal, solar wind energy, and union wish list proposals, not to mention the $25 million they did manage to coerce the Republicans to accept, such as $25 million to the Kennedy Center, $75 million to the National Endowment for the Arts/Humanities, and other pet projects. Fortunately, Rep. Bryan Steil (R) is introducing a bill to have that payment stopped, considering the Kennedy Center has laid off staff.

Pelosi has essentially held the Congress hostage just to sneak in big pork at a time when our nation is in crisis. She also did it with Phase 1 of the legislation, when she tried to get abortion funding. People are succumbing daily to a deadly virus, and Pelosi felt compelled to leave her gated community with her gourmet ice-cream-stocked fridge to fly to Washington to ensure people could still continue the slaughter of unborn humans. Some of the push came from Rep. Jim Clyburn (D), recognizing that legislation in the trillions isn’t likely to come by again in their lifetimes. Then she held off on the addition funds for small businesses, yet said on one Lefty network that it was the president who held it up.  Blatant lies!  And don’t think this is over. The Dems are now pushing for the inclusion of “green” priorities if there is a Phase 4 funding bill, all in an effort to advance their progressive agenda. How selfish.


And while Governor Cuomo has been amply demonstrating his leadership skills daily, there have been some pitfalls. He was caught hording ventilators while reprimanding the president for not getting enough to him, and he put restrictions on a drug (hydroxychloroquine) that could possibly save many lives; meanwhile, thousands in the City of New York have become infected and are dying. And in yet another underhanded attempt to triumph in 2020, Democrats are using fear to increase “vote by mail” schemes, which they’ve already succeeded in doing in California and Oregon, expanding opportunities for voter fraud. Don’t tell me this isn’t part of an insidious scheme; after all, they’ve spent nearly three and half years showing that they must win at all costs.

The icing on the cake is the attempt, courtesy of Schiff and Pelosi, to target the president by instituting a House Committee to oversee his COVID-19 response, enabling them to subpoena documents. Watch them ask for his tax returns. I don’t think there’s been anything more flagrant in an attempt to dismantle a leader’s governance, except perhaps the Duke of Warwick’s systematic pursuit of England’s King Edward III in the ongoing Wars of the Roses.  Warwick tried three times, first with the deposed king (Henry VI), then Edward’s own greedy brother (not Richard III who, upon Edward’s death, imprisoned and then killed Edward’s first and second heirs (12 and 10, respectively), but rather George Plantagenet), and finally the former queen (Margaret D’Anjou). If you think shit like this isn’t real, just look at history.  That’s the real game of thrones.

But we live in a Republic, not a monarchy, and this isn’t the Middle Ages.  And so the Left has had to squirm and writhe, and plot and plan, in their effort to unseat Trump.  The Democrats are tenacious; I’ll give them that, as is their fierce leader, Queen Nancy, but that tenacity, and more their avarice, will  be their downfall.

The Euphemisms of the Left

The other day I came across a news post reporting that Susan Sarandon’s recent injury would preclude her from attending a Sanders event in New Hampshire.  Tsk, tsk.  As she notified her adoring public via Instagram, she also issued a call to action, stating that, “This is an emergency.”  My curiosity peaked, and duly bolstered by her appearance, I read on, desirous to uncover this “emergency.”  She continued, “Ask the scientists, the farmers, the creatures in the sea.  Ask all those who have lost their homes from hurricanes, flood and fire, ask the endless stream of climate refugees, and the people of Flint, San Juan, and Standing rock.”  She added in the opioid epidemic, gun violence, the prison system, and homophobia (along with all the other phobias the Left now lump together, a la Hillary Clinton).  It was a cauldron of information, such that my brain was flying in alternate directions trying to mete out the substance from the steam; in other words:  fact from fiction, real problem from social issue.

See the source image

This is a perfect example of the way the Left works, lumping together all social ills—ills which often plague most societies regardless of economic standing in the world—and then, of course, pointing blame.  I’m not going to waste precious time countering Sarandon by writing about the very good state of the economy, what President Trump is doing for prison reform and the opioid epidemic, the fact that gun violence is more a mental health issue or one of economics than a gun issue, or that the Flint situation was the result of a shift from the water sources of Lake Huron and the Detroit River to the lead-contaminated Flint River.  Nor do I need to state the obvious:  that hurricanes, floods, and fires do occur regularly around the globe, and always have, contrary to what she might believe.  Still, none of that was as effective in engendering a reaction in me than the phrase:  “climate refugees.”  This isn’t the first time I’ve heard the term, but it was enough to repulse me.

I’m currently getting through Victor Davis Hanson’s fabulous book, “The Case for Trump.”  In it, he addresses the evolution, only recently, of the term “illegal alien,” once the technical legal term for non-citizens not holding green cards or visas.  Interestingly, the term has morphed from “illegal alien,” to “illegal immigrant,” then onto “undocumented immigrant,” and finally “undocumented migrant,” before it’s new incarnation, which I’ve only recently discovered and which Sarandon obviously favors:  “climate refugee.”  Clearly, someone who coined this phrase bypassed the word migrant altogether in lieu of refugee, painting a more “desperate” picture. There are many more incarnations of the phrase, too numerous to keep the reader engaged.  Unremarkably, Julian Castro has introduced legislation to change the legal term to “undocumented foreign national.”  Evidently, he believes “illegal alien” is too offensive.  I wonder whether it’s the word illegal he doesn’t favor, or alien.

This example alone demonstrates the irrationality of the Left.  Not only can’t they see in their limited interpretation that human beings unauthorized to live on U.S. soil are, in fact, illegal, and are required to undergo a process in order to enter the country (not to mention what rampant illegal crossings have been doing and will further do to this nation), but they additionally are compelled to alter the language in order to make the concept of illegals streaming to the border in overrun caravans more palatable.  Even more outlandish is the effort to associate the illegals with climate change.  No longer migrants who are, according to them, just seeking work in America, they are now refugees escaping conditions supposedly caused, not by the previous excuse of persecution or conflict, but rather the change in weather.  Call it a simplistic viewpoint, but isn’t it, after all?

The Left does have a fondness for terminology, and they place value on language revision as a means to further their goals and amass recruits to their agenda. This, in truth, was the thrust of the PC movement before it morphed into that which is beyond words:  thoughts, behavior, and anything else they want molded to their idiosyncratic ideology, such as all of society.   Take for example the recent alteration of “quid pro quo” to the much-researched  “bribery,” a term the Democrats’ focus group found more egregious.  It shines the mirror on their ridiculousness, and yet their hypocrisy is rendered clear because just as the Left often reject connotations—for any number of bloated reasons, such as they’re patriarchal or they cause offense—they do employ connotations at will because accurate descriptions of things both tangible and intangible might just steer more perceptive listeners away from their grand design; that being:  complete CONTROL.


The Migrant Creep

Recently, Tucker Carlson aired yet another segment addressing the migrant crisis.  In it, he added that there’s been a flood of African migrants from nations like Cameroon, Congo, and Angola.  According to Fox News, since May 30, nearly 500 African migrants have been apprehended at the Mexican border.  Some have passed through several countries in order to get here, though how and with what funds confounds me.  Where are these migrants looking to settle?  Well, according to Carlson, it’s in, of all places, states like Maine.

I moved to Maine in November of 2018, and I don’t regret to say that I fled eight months later.  Before that, I fled Western Massachusetts owing to its hippie-like Northampton culture, accompanied by a giant dose of Smith College and U-Mass gray-haired liberals, coupled with a generous sprinkling of welfare-dependent Puerto Ricans.  I got to Maine, to a town just 12 miles north of Portland, and what do I encounter daily?  Aside from the nouveau-hippies, a bunch of gray-haired, Subaru-driving liberals, accompanied by a smattering of African refugees who stand out against the whiteness of Mainers, not to mention numerous Muslims adorned in traditional garb.  This is the migrant creep of New England, and it’s telling.  In Maine, it’s bad enough the incongruence of these new cultures amidst the truck-driving, plain-spoken everyday-ness of typical Mainers.  But the question is:  Is it really fair?  Maine, like any rural state, is comprised largely of English and other European immigrants, and indigenous peoples.  Now?  Well, it’s up for grabs, like every other corner of the U.S., thanks to the aforementioned Liberals who have created their own creep in this largely conservative state.  Now, it’s the migrants.  I don’t disdain immigrants, but a forced influx of illegals owing to a crisis overrunning our nation is abhorrent in so many ways and for so many reasons.

Thing is, the liberal Left can’t help themselves, and yet they fail to see what their agenda creates, like Frankenstein’s monster who couldn’t see beyond the “now” of his immediate desire to create.  Drive into Portland, and the blatantness of its transformation is clear.  This is New England Liberalville 101.  As you enter, you’re assaulted visually by the bevy of heroin addicts laid out in the park, coupled with able-bodied sign-holders panhandling just a stone’s throw from Whole Foods and Trader Joes.  Drive further, and you’re accosted by every single “type” that has appeared in a Subaru commercial or who look like they work at Google, Facebook, or Twitter.  Then there’s the migrants looking as if they arrived fresh off of Obama’s generosity, acting as if they own the place.  And yet, for a town that once harbored a reputation for American industrial greatness, it now leaves little to the imagination.  For all it’s “foodie” repute, nothing charms.  There’s very little that’s pretty here, and many of the eateries are either too small, too dirty, difficult to get into, overly expensive, or floating on a reputation when they should have long ago faltered. After a long wait, once you’re in, you encounter the world of wool hats, stretched ears, tattoos, piercings, man buns, and patchouli.  Even then, I confess I’ve had more “meh” meals than great.  So much for Bon Appetit’s 2018 best “foodie town” award.  It’s telling when there are Starbucks here, and yet the Starbucks phenomenon hasn’t  stirred urban growth.

I would seriously like to know how Liberals really feel knowing that their own Subaru-driving, man-bun wearing enclave will soon be diluted owing to their immigration munificence.  Just as it’s happening to the conservative white-man culture they so disdain, it’s happening to theirs.  Their Kumbaya-Utopia fantasy will never come about, but they can’t see it because they can’t learn from history, since history is so frightening to revisit, and their socialist, globalist, bureaucratic goals are too enticing to let go of.  Perhaps if they could just get Obama back, they could then feel good again as they are cleansed  of their white sins while he apologizes for America, feeds the bureaucratic machine, and browns America.

We could stop it if enough of us understood that success in our nation derives from the prevailing of tradition, and with that means assimilation into the culture, not into other cultures or one melted pot (which, like socialism, will never work).  But there are many who don’t care.  Regardless, one thing is for sure, if Trump doesn’t succeed, we’re as doomed as Europe.

Four reasons why the new liberal agenda is dangerous

There’s a problem with the liberal agenda.  Not only is it hypocritical, finger-pointing, and often absurd, it’s also dangerous . . . very dangerous.

To wit:

1. Their love of Muslims

The fact that three Muslim women now hold positions in our U.S. Congress is unmistakably dangerous.  No single individual who harbors any disdain for the United States or our allies (e.g., Israel) should be working in our government, especially in high offices and, most particularly, serving on the Foreign Affairs Committee!  Muslims who don’t espouse our values will fight against us; it’s just how they work, and already we see the push-back and the efforts to reform our cultural values.  Even worse than the loud-mouths, however, are those anti-America Muslims discretely infiltrating the nation.  It’s no mistake that Obama’s administration allotted over 800,000 green cards to migrant Muslims in six years of his presidency, according to Dept. of Homeland statistics.  It is estimated it might have reached 1 million by the end of his two terms.  Undoubtedly, more than one of those has an anti-American agenda.

This is how Islam will win.  Not by flying planes into buildings, nor by driving trucks into pedestrians:  Just a slow, steady penetration, followed by a shift in leadership and a change in the cultural mindset.  Congress is one such place where this will show to be most egregious.  Our educational institutions are another.  If you haven’t taken a look at the Creeping Sharia blog, it’s time you do.  It addresses, among other salient points, the indoctrination of Muslim ideals through liberal textbooks, and the naïve inclinations of liberal teachers and staff who advance the Islamic agenda.

I do not lie when I recount that in 1986, when I met a friend’s boyfriend for the first time—a Muslim from Pakistan, he had the audacity to confess that Muslims were slowly infiltrating the U.S. with one agenda.  In my folly I negated it and insisted it will never happen.  Well, it’s happening.  Liberals think voting Muslims into office is all part of their Kumbaya-unicorn-utopian paradigm, but that “diversity” blueprint is just another way our nation and its culture is eroding, only one day to be extinguished.  If they were worried about Russians, they ought to be more vexed about Muslims they’re embracing.


2. Their adoration with Socialism

Thanks to the hypocrite Bernie Sanders, socialism is now front and center in American politics.  With freshman upstarts like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, socialism is now a fundamental principle of the cleaving Democrat party.  Our core American beliefs are being challenged by ideologues, some of whom, like Sanders, are part of the post-Woodstock counterculture that divisively sought to buck society, rebel against traditional Make-America-Venezuelavalues, and foster a new collectivistic idealism, one based in false egalitarianism and socialist ideals.  Now Millennials are embracing it.

But the problem lies in the fact that they are just that:  ideals.  Put socialism into practice, and one need only see that the political ideology doesn’t work well on paper.  Just ask Venezuelans and Cubans.  Oh, and to all those trying to find a model example, Sweden is not socialist.  Even China, once considered communist, has crept towards authoritarian capitalism.

Societies work well in hierarchies, as flawed as they can be.  They enable production and invention, cultivate talent and opportunity, and foster free enterprise.  If the U.S. veers Left, American money will be rationed away until only the ruling elite get to eat their cake and have it too.  Say goodbye to your freedom and your cozy standard of living, and get ready to start standing in line, and long ones at that.  Oh, and zip your trap as you weather the transition lest the military police put you behind bars (that is, if China doesn’t take over first, then you’ll just be executed).

3. Their fascist agenda

Yes, you read that correctly.  Leftists embrace a fascist agenda.  How do they do that?  Well, fascists, by definition, have no tolerance for positions that oppose their ideologies. Leftist fascists disrupt peaceful Right-wing protests.  They also block free speech by denying speakers like Ben Shapiro, Ann Coulter, and Milo Yiannopoulos, because God forbid conservatives try to penetrate American universities, those bastions of liberal inculcation.  The Left even resort to aggression.  Though their name suggests otherwise, Antifa operate as fascists would:  through violence and intimidation, shutting down or disrupting speeches, rioting in the streets, damaging property, and even blockading main thoroughfares, a favorite pastime of Black Lives Matter as well as Antifa, members of which went so far as to harass an old man in Portland in October of 2018, chasing him down, bashing his car, and calling him a white supremacist, all because he took a left turn.  Meanwhile, the Portland police had their hands tied by a Leftist city government.

Just because of a red hat, people on the Right get punched in the face, get harassed on field trips to Washington DC, and have guns pointed at them among countless merciless crimes, and it’s okay in their skewed minds because somehow that red hat equates with the hooded hat of the KKK . .  only because that’s what the Left has been selling as their narrative to their desperate, mindless masses.  As if President Trump’s America parallels the convictions that produced lynchings and segregation.  If anyone desires segregation today, it’s the Left—just look at all the black-only zones emerging in U.S. colleges.

Instead of being afraid of a red hat, they ought to look at what President Trump has been doing for America, but they’re too scared to take a peek, lest they are transformed.  I see “Don’t believe the hype” signs on social media as another way to reinforce their agenda, make sure Trump’s successes aren’t, well, trumping their grand design; they ought to step back and see where the “hype” is really originating, in the Leftist message, passed on by whack-job media pundits and politicians who sell their souls every day to push their false truths.

Getting back to the fascists, after an April 2017 skirmish with Trump supporters, there was an exchange on Reddit among Antifa members about how they could make their “protests” more impactful.  It shows one poster, aptly titled “anarchist,” referring to their members as “comrades” as he laments their lack of “training.”  The string goes on to address a need for better “tactical organization,” stating that they ought to get “more Antifa [members] armed.” Another poster stated that the Right was mostly armed, and asked, “Why aren’t we?” then continued on, stating that “even handguns would help.”  This from the side that largely opposes the Second Amendment.  An unnamed poster posited:  “Isn’t using violence to silence opposing voices a form of fascism?” whereby the response was: “oh god not this shit again.”  Yes, the truth hurts.

The danger of the Left lies in their uncompromising resistance to everything Trump.  If it’s not groups like Antifa doing their (silent) bidding (since when have you heard a Democrat politician come out against Antifa?), it’s a Bernie supporter shooting congressmen at baseball practice.  (And we still don’t know the motive of that Las Vegas shooter who killed 58 people and injured another 527 at a country music event, which is oddly suspicious in itself.)  It’s also in that omnipotent institution:  the media, much of which is operated by Leftist corporations.  They all wake up each day to the nightmare that Trump is president, and swear to do their part in the Resistance.

It’s funny how the Left is exceptionally good at projection.  They call everyone exactly what they, themselves, represent.  For example, they like to call President Trump “Hitler,” and reference him as an autocratic dictator (this of the man who hugged the American flag at CPAC; I seriously wonder if any Democrat would hug the American flag!). But just take a look at this phrase from Hitler.  Enough said!


4. Toppling of American ideals

Nothing has become more evident since the last presidential election than the rising epidemic of hate for anything uniquely American.  As part of their Resistance movement, the Left’s agenda is to dispense with American ideals, erase American history, and form a new culture based on their bogus utopian idealism.  Anything that is a “monument” (literally and figuratively) to our past is wicked, and so the focus turns to the negatives of American history.  They literally seek to expunge anything that made America great because they can’t stomach the notion of making it great again.  They topple statuary, look to re-name Columbus Day, repaint our Founding Fathers only as slave owners and oppressors, and hold nothing from our past in esteem.  It’s Liberal Revisionist History.  They reinforce this narrative over and over again.  Nothing and no one that is staunchly “American” holds any value, most particularly the American White Male, and they continue to diminish the white male anywhere they can.  Just watch commercial TV for an hour and pay attention to the ads.  White men are either dorks, or need the astute guidance of women or blacks.  It’s very evident.

And if someone or some group doesn’t agree with the Left or conform to their dictates, they happily pidgeonhole them.  They constantly adhere to tribal allegiance and race, and yet pin the racist label on anyone with a divergent point of view.  Instead of critical thinking, we get emotional hysteria.  Facts no longer matter, only what they feel about things, and everyone needs a safe space from it all.  Instead of embracing the mindset of early Americans—the Emersonian “pick yourself up by your bootstraps” ideal, or the Calvinist ideals of hard work in shaping Colonial America—people are being told what to think, and how to feel about it all.  The Left are the Thought Police, the PC Police, the Cultural-appropriation Police, and the Behavior Police.  They force conservatives out of restaurants, storm the halls of Congress to harass Republicans, and paint one consistent portrait of the depravity of Right-wing ideals, including our most perplexing obsession with a child’s right to life and the prevention of infanticide.  They despise the American values of liberty and independence, as they yearn for a new non-American Collective, one without borders and with no one to administer law (since they also despise ICE and all manner of law enforcement).

In short, in the mindset of the American Left, it’s “my way or the highway.”  Only they are right and only they “speak truth,” to borrow a phrase from that angry big-mouth, Rashida Tlaib, defending the other angry big-mouth, Ilhan Omar.  And, by golly, they are going to scratch and claw their way to victory, taking the President and the country down with them. If that isn’t dangerous, I don’t know what is.


What Kiera Knightly got wrong

Kiera Knightly announced recently on the The Ellen DeGeneres Show that she instituted a ban on certain Disney movies in her home, disallowing her daughter from watching films like Cinderella and The Little Mermaid.  Kristen Bell also jumped on board, slamming Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.  Bell, incidentally, lent her voice to the highly acclaimed Frozen, a Disney film I found to be too convoluted for kids, and significantly tedious for adults.

SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS, Snow White, Prince Charming, 1937

Knightly’s reasoning for the ban for a film like Cinderella is that, “she waits around for a rich guy to rescue her,” followed by the advice to “Rescue yourself!”  As to The Little Mermaid, Knightly cautioned:  “Do not give your voice up for a man.  Hello!” For Bell, it was the audaciousness of Prince Charming kissing the sleeping Snow White, sans consent, that drove her off the edge.

I take issue with these comments on numerous counts, but I’m only going to address two, the first being that what these women, and many Leftist feminists like them, fail to comprehend is that fairy tales are allegories; they teach lessons in morality, aside from being a source of entertainment, fantasy, and escapism, for kids and adults.  I can’t deny that I love them, especially the musicals.  Beauty and the Beast, for example, depicts the female lead, Belle, shunning the arrogant and conceited Gaston for the boorish Beast.  Belle fearlessly tames the Beast (note that, feminists!), thereby freeing him to regain his gentlemanly demeanor, while he opens her up to a world of books and a new experience away from the mundanity of village life.  It’s a symbiotic relationship.  Snow White illustrates the hazards of vanity and selfish desire, as depicted in the evil Queen. The same can be said for the usurping and wicked stepmother in Cinderella.


As to Bell’s comment, the Mermaid didn’t give her voice up for a man; she gave it up for the lure of an eternal soul.  Yes, she longed for the prince, but he was incidental considering eternity is what she got in the end.  Indeed, Bell overlooked the fact that the Mermaid—a female—actually rescued the prince—a male—from drowning.  Isn’t that a characterization of feminine strength?  Clearly not enough.

The second issue, and most pertinent that these women and their cause fail to see, is something called historical context.  Knightly should understandKnightly historical context considering her film The Duchess, in which she portrayed Georgiana Spencer, an ancestor of Princess Diana’s.  Georgiana, “G” as they called her, was married off at seventeen to the Duke of Devonshire, a known philanderer who eventually had a long-standing affair with G’s friend, Bess, after the Duchess naively invited her to cohabitate with them (they married after her death).  Eventually, the neglected Duchess had her own affair with Charles Grey who would go on to become Prime Minister of the U.K. (incidentally, Earl Grey tea was named for him).  Before G’s husband cruelly forced them apart, she had gone off to the country to have Grey’s child, whom she was compelled to relinquish to Grey, lest she lose her children with the Duke (one of whom was actually the Duke’s daughter from another woman).  If Knightly wants to discuss female victimization at the hands of a man, I’d say it was the character she aptly portrayed.

What context has to do with it is that a story like Cinderella, which was written in 1667, enjoys film adaptations that take place anywhere from the 18th to the 19th centuries.  Just look at her ball gown and the fact that they ride horses.  It certainly isn’t present day! The same can be said for Beauty and the Beast, a story written in the 18th century.  Between Belle’s gown and the Beast’s attire, the period is crystal clear.  Snow White emerges during the late Middle Ages, and The Little Mermaid was written in 1836.


What does this mean?  One thing and one thing only.  If it seems as if men have to rescue women in these stories, it is because they often did.  Throughout the ages, until women were able to take up work in the mid-19th century, they relied on their husbands for financial security and safety.  If you lacked the prospects for a respectable marriage for whatever reason (hidden away by a cruel stepmother, or living as a humble villager with only an arrogant narcissist to woo you, or cohabitating with dwarfs in the woods, or as a mermaid longing for the vibrancy of life above water), you had limited choices, especially once your parents passed on.  Your only hope was the fantasy of being rescued by some nobleman who could provide a better life.  That is the point.

If only women like Kiera Knightly could use such films as springboards for instruction, it would be a win-win situation for her daughter and all children.  But considering how the Leftist mindset works—striving to erase history and all historical context rather than use them as teachable opportunities—it’s no wonder they paint these films with a broad brush of chauvinism and male domination.